I fully agree with the aregument of his critique, because this is basically the same thesis that I have. Even though Brownlee sounds like she knows what shes talking about and uses language that makes it easily understandable, she doesnt have any facts or sources to back it up. I fully agree with the argument, and organization of his critique, however at times i found it hard to understand or keep me interested. It was almost like the introduction had nothing to do witht the paper it was just there to be there